Tag: 上海夜网ZZ

Cash-strapped M&CC $20M celebrations ludicrous

first_imgDear Editor,The very thought that the Mayor and Councillors of the City of Georgetown is even considering splurging $20 million on itself under the guise that it is hosting a week of activities to celebrate its anniversary is just revolting.The members of the administration and/or the committee that came up with such a reckless proposal are evidently demented and not in touch with reality. They should be ashamed of themselves, and be condemned by those in authority at City Hall.How on earth could a municipality that is bankrupt; that is supposedly penniless; that constantly runs to Central Government for bailouts and other forms of financial assistance; that owes, as they say in Guyana, ‘Tom, Dick and HarryLall,’ even conceptualise such an idea. It is at best ludicrous.But the real question to be asked is: What does Georgetown have to celebrate? The collapsed wharf at Stabroek Market? The clocks at the various markets that do not work? The fact that the iconic City Hall is crumbling and falling apart? The rise in crime around the municipal markets? The non-completion of the Kitty Market? The statutory rape of a minor and killing of a mentally ill man whilst he was in the custody of the City Constabulary? They have done absolutely nothing to rejoice about.It would seem that the only validation and rationalisation that the Mayor could advance for the hosting of this ostentatious merriment is that the event is something which was held in the past but had been stopped, and that the event could be likened to that of the annual town weeks of New Amsterdam, Bartica and Linden. This reminds us of the pidgin-style saying: ‘Monkey see, monkey do’, which implies the act of mimicry, usually with limited knowledge and/or concern for the consequences.How pathetic! Do the New Amsterdam, Bartica and Linden municipalities fail to remit workers’ contributions to the Guyana Revenue Authority or the National Insurance Scheme, leaving their workers without any sickness, injury or maternity benefits?Sincerely,Modi Sankarlast_img read more

Read More Cash-strapped M&CC $20M celebrations ludicrous

Judge Paegar’s Delayed Ruling Questioned

first_imgThe delay by Judge Chan-Chan Paegar, on the three judge panel at the Commercial Court, to make available his final ruling on trademark infringement of “pop drink” has caused one of the parties to write a complaint against his behavior to his colleagues.Judge Paegar, without a written document, on August 5, 2016, gave a three minute ruling in the case against H.K. Enterprise, a Lebanese owned business by BAF Trading Corporation, and promised to have hardcopies available on Wednesday, August 10.However, when he spoke with the Daily Observer on Tuesday, August 23, he admitted to the delay saying that it happened as a result of a serious medical situation. BAF’s lead lawyer, Cllr. Tiawan Gongloe, has complained about the delay to the other judges on the panel.The release of the final ruling document would have enabled BAF to file its ‘Bill of Exception’ to the Supreme Court within ten days to announce an appeal against Paegar’s decision.Without that instrument, H.K. Enterprise could take the opportunity to communicate with the Supreme Court to dismiss any appeal filed to it on the matter on grounds that the ten-day period had expired.In his client’s letter of complaint, Cllr. Gongloe said he requested for a copy of Judge Paegar’s written ruling and final judgment pronounced on Friday, August 5, when the Judge informed the parties that the written ruling and judgment would be ready on Wednesday, August 10.The letter dated August 15, further read: “Monday, August 15, was the tenth day since Judge Paegar announced the judgment against the petitioner, BAF, yet the record of this case showed that Judge Paegar’s written ruling and judgment is not ready.”The letter asked Judge Paegar to do everything humanly possible to make available his ruling and final judgment in order to enable his client to file a ‘Bill of Exception’ as required by law.Judge Paegar ruled that both BAF and H.K. Enterprise did not have the legitimate right to import the product into the country, because they don’t have permission from the Liberia Industrial Property Office (LIPO), a party to the case.He said the parties did not obtain licenses from LIPO for the trademark to import pop drink for the Liberian market – although BAF was licensed in 2010 for ten years to import the product, while H.K. Enterprise also obtained a license from LIPO in 2014 to import the same product.Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)last_img read more

Read More Judge Paegar’s Delayed Ruling Questioned